I sit with Shakespeare and he winces not. Across
the color line I move arm in arm with Balzac and Dumas,
where smiling men and welcoming women glide in gilded
halls. From out of the caves of evening that swing between
the strong-limbed earth and the tracery of the stars,
I summon Aristotle and Aurelius, and what soul I will,
and they come all graciously with no scorn nor condescension.
W.E.B. DuBois
I think the authors of that notable
instrument [The Declaration of Independence] intended to
include all men, but they did not intend to declare all
men equal in all respects. They did not mean to say all
were equal in color, size, intellect, moral developments,
or social capacity. They defined with tolerable distinctness,
in what respects they did consider all men created equal–equal
in "certain inalienable rights, among which are life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.'" This they
said, and this meant. They did not mean to assert the obvious
untruth, that all were then actually enjoying that equality,
nor yet, that they were about to confer it immediately upon
them. In fact they had no power to confer such a boon. They
meant simply to declare the right, so that the enforcement
of it might follow as fast as circumstances should permit.
They meant to set up a standard maxim for free society,
which should be familiar to all, and revered by all; constantly
looked to, constantly labored for, and even though never
perfectly attained, constantly approximated, and thereby
constantly spreading and deepening its influence, and augmenting
the happiness and value of life to all people of all colors
everywhere. . . . Its authors meant it to be, thank God,
it is now proving itself, a stumbling block to those who
in after times might seek to turn a free people back into
the hateful paths of despotism.
Abraham Lincoln